开发学院 WEB开发 Jsp JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts 阅读

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs Struts

　2008-01-05 09:07:37　来源：WEB开发网　闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽鎳撻—鍐偓锝庝簻椤掋垺銇勯幇顖毿撻柟渚垮妼椤粓宕卞Δ鈧獮濠勭磽閸屾艾鈧懓顫濋妸鈺佺疅缂佸顑欓崥瀣煕椤愵偅绶氱紓鍐╂礋濮婂宕掑▎鎴М濠电姭鍋撻梺顒€绉甸幆鐐哄箹濞ｎ剙濡肩紒鎰殜閺屸€愁吋鎼粹€茬敖婵炴垶鎸哥粔鐢稿Φ閸曨垰鍐€妞ゆ劦婢€濞岊亪姊虹紒妯诲蔼闁稿海鏁诲濠氭晲婢跺﹤宓嗛梺缁樺姈缁佹挳宕戦幘璇叉嵍妞ゆ挻绋戞禍鐐叏濡厧浜鹃悗姘炬嫹

闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽鎳撻—鍐偓锝庝簼閹癸綁鏌ｉ鐐搭棞闁靛棙甯掗～婵嬫晲閸涱剙顥氬┑掳鍊楁慨鐑藉磻濞戔懞鍥偨缁嬫寧鐎梺鐟板⒔缁垶宕戦幇鐗堢厵缂備焦锚缁椦囨煃瑜滈崜锕傚矗閸愵煈娼栭柛婵嗗珔瑜斿畷鎯邦槾濞寸姴銈稿铏规嫚閼碱剛顔夐梺鐓庣秺缁犳牠骞冩ィ鍐╁€婚柦妯侯槼閹芥洟姊洪棃娑辨濠碘€虫喘瀹曘垽鎮介崨濞炬嫼闁荤喐鐟ョ€氱兘宕箛娑欑厱闁绘ê纾晶鐢告煏閸℃鈧湱缂撴禒瀣窛濠电姴瀚獮鍫ユ⒑绾懎顥嶉柟娲讳簽濡叉劙寮撮悢鍝勨叞闂傚倸鍊风欢姘缚瑜嶇叅闁靛牆娲犻崑鎾愁潩椤愩垹绁梺缁樹緱閸ｏ綁鐛幒鎳虫棃鍩€椤掑倻涓嶉柨婵嗘缁♀偓闂傚倸鐗婄粙鎴﹀汲濞嗗緷鐟扳堪閸垻鏆梺鍝勭焿缂嶄焦鎱ㄩ埀顒勬煃閹増纭炬繝鈧潏銊х彾闁哄洨鍠撶弧鈧┑顔斤供閸橀箖宕㈤悽鍛娾拺缂備焦锚婵箓鏌涢幘鏉戝摵闁诡喗蓱濞煎繘濡搁妶鍥╃暰闂備礁婀辩划顖滄暜閻愬瓨娅犳繛鎴炴皑绾捐偐绱撴担璐細婵炴彃顕埀顒冾潐濞叉牕鐣烽鍐簷闂備礁鎲￠崝鏇㈠疮閻樿绀堟繝闈涚墛瀹曞弶绻涢幋鐐ㄧ細闁哄棗妫楅埞鎴︽偐鏉堫偄鍘￠梺杞扮劍閻楁粎妲愰幘瀛樺濞寸姴顑呴幗鐢告⒑閸︻厽鍤€婵炲眰鍊濋幃楣冩倻閽樺顔婇梺瑙勬儗閸樹粙宕撻悽鍛娾拺闁荤喐婢橀幃渚€鏌ｉ幒鐐电暤闁诡喗顨婇獮鏍ㄦ媴閸忓瀚藉┑鐐舵彧缁插潡宕曢妶澶婂惞闁逞屽墴濮婃椽骞栭悙娴嬪亾閺嶎厽鍋嬮柣妯垮吹瀹撲線鐓崶銊р姇闁哄懏鎮傞弻銊╂偆閸屾稑顏�

婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈攻閸欏繘鏌ｉ幋锝嗩棄闁哄绶氶弻娑樷槈濮楀牊鏁鹃梺鍛婄懃缁绘垿濡甸崟顖氱闁告鍋熸禒鑲╃磽娴ｅ搫顎岄柛銊ョ埣瀵鈽夐姀鐘电杸闂傚倸鐗婄粙鎺楁倶閸儲鍊甸柣鐔哄閸熺偟绱掔拠鎻掓殻濠碉紕鏁诲畷鐔碱敍濮橀硸鍟嬮梺璇查叄濞佳囧箺濠婂牊鍋╁┑鍌氭啞閳锋垹鐥鐐村婵炲吋鍔栫换娑㈡嚑椤掆偓閺嬪孩銇勯銏㈢缂佽鲸甯掕灒闁兼祴鏅滈崵宀勬⒒娓氣偓閳ь剛鍋涢懟顖涙櫠椤旇偐鏆嗛柨婵嗙墕閸斿灚銇勯敂鐣屽弨闁诡噯绻濇俊鑸靛緞鐎ｎ剙甯鹃梻浣稿閸嬪懐鎹㈤崘顔肩；妞ゅ繐鎳愮粻鍓р偓鐟板閸犳洜鑺辨繝姘畾闁绘柨鍚嬮埛鎴︽倵閸︻厼校闁靛棗鍟撮弻銈夊礃閼碱剙鐓熼悗瑙勬礃缁诲牓寮崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帒瀚ч埀顒佹瀹曟﹢顢欓崲澹洦鐓曢柍鈺佸枤濞堟﹢鏌ｉ悢绋垮婵﹥妞介幃鈩冩償閳╁啯鐦ｉ梻浣虹帛閻楁洟濡剁粙璺ㄦ殾闁绘垶岣跨弧鈧梺鎼炲劀閸愩劎銈梻鍌欑窔濞佳勵殽韫囨洘顫曢柡鍥ュ灩閸屻劍銇勮箛鎾跺闁抽攱鍨块弻鐔兼嚃閳轰椒绮堕梺鍛婃⒐椤ㄥ﹪寮婚敓鐘插窛妞ゆ棃鏁慨鍥╃磽娴ｇǹ鈧湱鏁悢濡撳洨鈧潧鎽滅壕濂稿级閸稑濡肩紒妤佺缁绘盯鎮℃惔锝囶啋闂佺硶鏂侀崜婵嬪箯閸涘瓨鐓ラ悗锝呯仛缂嶆姊婚崒姘偓宄懊归崶褜娴栭柕濞炬櫆閸婂潡鏌ㄩ弴鐐测偓鍝ョ不閺屻儲鐓曢柕澶樺枛婢ь噣鏌＄€ｂ晝绐旈柡宀€鍠栧畷婊嗩槾閻㈩垱鐩弻锟犲川椤旇棄鈧劙鏌＄仦璇插闁诡喓鍊濆畷鎺戔槈濮楀棔绱�闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽鎳撻—鍐偓锝庝簻椤掋垺銇勯幇顖毿撻柟渚垮妼椤粓宕卞Δ鈧獮濠勭磽閸屾艾鈧懓顫濋妸鈺佺疅缂佸顑欓崥瀣煕椤愵偅绶氱紓鍐╂礋濮婂宕掑▎鎴М濠电姭鍋撻梺顒€绉甸幆鐐哄箹濞ｎ剙濡肩紒鎰殜閺屸€愁吋鎼粹€茬敖婵炴垶鎸哥粔鐢稿Φ閸曨垰鍐€妞ゆ劦婢€濞岊亪姊虹紒妯诲蔼闁稿海鏁诲濠氭晲婢跺﹤宓嗛梺缁樺姈缁佹挳宕戦幘璇叉嵍妞ゆ挻绋戞禍鐐叏濡厧浜鹃悗姘炬嫹　　闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻锝夊箣閿濆憛鎾绘煕閵堝懎顏柡灞诲€濆畷顐﹀Ψ閿旇姤鐦庡┑鐐差嚟婵潧顫濋妸褎顫曢柟鎹愵嚙绾惧吋绻涢崱妯虹瑨闁告﹫绱曠槐鎾寸瑹閸パ勭彯闂佹悶鍔岄悥鍏间繆閹绢喖绀冩い鏃傚帶缁愭盯姊洪崫鍕垫Ч闁搞劌缍婂畷銏犆洪鍛偓鍨殽閻愯尙浠㈤柛鏃€纰嶉妵鍕晜鐠囪尙浠搁悗瑙勬穿缁绘繈鐛惔銊﹀殟闁靛／鍐ㄥ闂傚倸饪撮崑鍕洪敃鈧叅闁哄秲鍔庢晶锟犳⒒閸屾瑦绁版い鏇嗗應鍋撻崹顐㈡诞鐎规洘绮撻幃銏＄附婢跺绋侀梻浣瑰劤缁绘劕锕㈡潏鈺侇棜闁稿繘妫跨换鍡樸亜閺嶃劎顣查柟顖氱墛閵囧嫰顢曢姀鈶裤垺銇勯鍕殻濠碘€崇埣瀹曞崬螖閳ь剟锝炴惔銊︹拺闁告稑饪撮悞濂告煕閵夋垵鎳庡銊モ攽閻橆喖鐏辨繛澶嬬閻у矂姊虹紒妯荤叆闁告艾顑夐幃锟犲Ψ閳哄倸鈧敻鏌ㄥ┑鍡涱€楅柛妯绘尦閺屾稓鈧綆鍋呯亸鎵磼缂佹ḿ绠撴い顐ｇ箞椤㈡ê鈽夊▎蹇ｄ紪闂備浇宕甸崰鎰垝鎼淬垺娅犳俊銈呭暞閺嗘粓鏌熼悜妯诲暗妞も晜褰冮湁闁绘挸娴烽幗鐘绘煟閹惧瓨绀嬮柡宀€鍠栭獮鍡氼檨闁搞倗鍠栭弻宥夋寠婢舵ɑ鈻堥梺鍝勮嫰缁夊墎妲愰幒鎳崇喖鎳￠妶鍛辈濠碉紕鍋戦崐銈夊磻閸涱垱宕查柛顐犲劚缁犵姵绻濇繝鍌涘櫣闁哄鐗婃穱濠囶敍濠垫劕娈銈呯箰缂嶅﹤顫忔繝姘＜婵炲棙鍩堝Σ顕€姊虹涵鍜佸殝缂佽鲸娲滈崚鎺戔枎閹惧磭顓洪梺鎸庢煥閹碱偅绂嶆總鍛娾拺闁告繂瀚峰Σ褰掓煕閵娧冩灈鐎殿喗鎮傚顕€宕奸悢鍝勫箰闂備礁鎲￠崝褏寰婇懞銉ь洸闁告挆鍛紳婵炶揪缍€濞咃絿鏁☉姘辩＜閻庯綆鍋呯亸鎵磼閸屾稑娴柡浣稿暣瀹曟帒顫濋幉瀣簥濠电姵顔栭崰妤呮晝閳哄懎绀堥柨鏇炲€归崐鐢告煙閹澘袚闁抽攱甯掗湁闁挎繂鎳忛幉鎼佹煥濞戞ḿ肖缂佽鲸甯￠、姘跺川椤撶姳妗撴俊銈囧Х閸嬬偤宕归崹顔炬殾闁割偅娲﹂弫鍡涙煕鐏炵偓鐨戦柕鍫畵濮婅櫣鎷犻幓鎺戞瘣缂傚倸绉村Λ娆戠矉瀹ュ鍐€妞ゆ挾鍋熼崫妤佺箾鐎电ǹ孝妞ゆ垵妫濋幃鈥斥枎閹剧补鎷哄銈嗘尪閸斿酣鎮鹃崡鐑嗙唵鐟滄粓宕归柆宥呂﹂柛鏇ㄥ灠濡﹢鏌涢…鎴濇灀闁稿鎸鹃幉鎾礋椤撴稒鏁靛┑鐘垫暩婵潙煤閿曞倸纾归梺鍨儍娴滄粓鐓崶銊﹀碍妞ゅ繈鍊濋弻娑氣偓锝庡亝瀹曞瞼鈧鍠栭埀顒傚櫏濡俱劌鈹戦悙鎻掓倯闁绘娲熼崺鐐哄箣閿旇棄浜归柣搴℃贡婵挳藟濠靛鈷戠紒瀣劵椤箓鏌涢弬鍧楀弰妤犵偛顦～銏犵暆閳ь剟鎮块埀顒€鈹戦悙鏉戠仸瀹€锝呮健閹潡宕ㄧ€涙ǚ鎷洪梺闈╁瘜閸欌偓婵＄偓鎮傞弻娑㈡偐閹颁焦鐤侀悗娈垮枟閻擄繝鐛弽銊﹀闁革富鍘煎鎶芥⒒娴ｈ櫣甯涙繛鍙夌墵瀹曟劙宕烽娑樹壕婵ḿ鍋撶€氾拷

核心提示：A brief comparisonOctober 19, 2004SummaryMy JSF article series and Meet the EXPerts appearance on IBM developerWorks received a lot of feedback. I would have to

　　A brief comparison
October 19, 2004
Summary
My JSF article series and Meet the EXPerts appearance on IBM developerWorks received a lot of feedback. I would have to say, the most common question or feedback came along the lines of comparing Struts to JSF.

My JSF article series and Meet the Experts appearance on IBM developerWorks received a lot of feedback.

I would have to say, the most common question or feedback came along the lines of comparing Struts to JSF. I thought it would be a good idea to compare JSF to Struts by evaluating various features that an application architect would look for in a Web application framework. This article will compare specific features. Those on which I will focus include:

Maturity
Controller Flexibility/Event Handling
Navigation
Page development
Integration
Extensibility
Certainly, there are other places in which you might want to do a comparison, sUCh as performance, but I'll focus on the set I just mentioned. I'll also spend more time on the Controller and Navigation sections because they are the heart of the frameworks. Performance of JSF is specific to the vendor implementation, and I always encourage people to perform their own performance tests against their own set of requirements because there are too many factors that can affect performance. A performance evaluation would be unfair. Other areas such as page layout, validation, and exception handling were also left out in the interest of saving space.
Maturity
Struts has been around for a few years and has the edge on maturity. I know of several successful PRoduction systems that were built using the Struts framework. One example is the WebSphere Application Server Web-based administrative console. javaServer Faces(JSF), however, has been in draft for 2 years. Several companies, including IBM as well as the creator of Struts, Craig McClanahan, have contributed to the creation of JSF during that time. Nonetheless, it will take some time to see a few systems deployed.
Struts definitely has the edge in this category. With JSF, however, you can rely on different levels of support depending on which implementation you choose. For example, the JSF framework inside WebSphere Studio comes with IBM support.

Controller Flexibility/Event Handling
One of the major goals of Struts was to implement a framework that utilized Sun's Model 2 framework and reduced the common and often repetitive tasks in Servlet and jsp development. The heart of Struts is the Controller. Struts uses the Front Controller Pattern and Command Pattern. A single servlet takes a request, translates HTTP parameters into a Java ActionForm, and passes the ActionForm into a Struts Action class, which is a command. The URI denotes which Action class to go to. The Struts framework has one single event handler for the HTTP request. Once the request is met, the Action returns the result back to the front controller, which then uses it to choose where to navigate next. The interaction is demonstrated in Figure 1.