InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks

核心提示：MyISAM和InnoDB的性能比较的一篇文章，可以看出InnoDB并不比MyISAM慢，InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks，而且InnoDB提供事务支持，PS： javaeye用的就是InnoDBInnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - p

MyISAM和InnoDB的性能比较的一篇文章，可以看出InnoDB并不比MyISAM慢。而且InnoDB提供事务支持。

PS： javaeye用的就是InnoDB

InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1

Several days ago MySQL AB made new storage engine Falcon available for wide auditory. We cannot miss this event and executed several benchmarks to see how Falcon performs in comparison to InnoDB and MyISAM.

The second goal of benchmark was a popular myth that MyISAM is faster than InnoDB in reads, as InnoDB is transactional, supports Foreign Key and has an operational overhead. As you will see it is not always true.

For benchmarks I used our PHPTestSuite which allows to test wide range tables and queries.

The script and instruction are available here:

http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/files/benchmarks/phptestsuite.stable.tar.gz

We used table "normal" table structure which corresponds to typical structure you would see in OLTP or Web applications - medium size rows, auto increment primary key and couple of extra indexes.

PLAIN TEXT

SQL:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `$tableName` (